SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do Clinical Librarians Matter? The First Randomized Controlled Trial in Librarianship
2 references·0 citing·6 second hop
Do Clinical Librarians Matter? The First Randomized Controlled Trial in Librarianship (2007)Do Clinical Librarians Matter? The First …Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical medical librarian programs: a systematic review of the literature. (2004)Evaluating the effectiveness …Systematic reviews : synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions (1998)Systematic reviews : synthesi…Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline? (2003)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance (2020)Evaluation of method in systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in LIS (2008)Effectiveness of bibliographic searches performed by paediatric residents and interns assisted by librarians. A randomised controlled trial (2011)Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1998Systematic reviews : synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions173 cited
  • 2004Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical medical librarian programs: a systematic review of the literature.116 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work