References

• 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
• 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
• 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
• 1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results853 cited
• 2001Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees764 cited
• 2002Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes660 cited
• 1992Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis640 cited
• 1993The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care562 cited
• 1995Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data492 cited
• 1980Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings.353 cited
• 2004Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group313 cited
• 2002Investigating causes of heterogeneity in systematic reviews213 cited
• 2002Development of The Cochrane Collaboration's Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials197 cited
• 1994The miracle of DICE therapy for acute stroke: fact or fictional product of subgroup analysis?