Abstract How many judgment and decision making (JDM) researchers have not claimed to be building on Herbert Simon’s work? We identify two of Simon’s goals for JDM research: He sought to understand people’s decision processes—the descriptive goal—and studied whether thesameprocesses lead to good decisions—the prescriptive goal. To investigate how recent JDM research relates to these goals, we analyzed the articles published in theJournal of Behavioral Decision Makingand inJudgment and Decision Makingfrom 2006 to 2010. Out of 377 articles, 91 cite Simon or we judged them as directly relating to his goals. We asked whether these articles areintegrative, in the following sense: For a descriptive article we asked if it contributes to building a theory thatreconcilesdifferent conceptualizations of cognition such as neural networks and heuristics. For a prescriptive article we asked if it contributes to building a method thatcombinesideas of other methods such as heuristics and optimization models. Based on our subjective judgments we found that the proportion of integrative articles was 67% of the prescriptive and 52% of the descriptive articles. We offer suggestions for achieving more integration of JDM theories. The article concludes with the thesis that although JDM researchers work under Simon’s spell, no one really knows what that spell is.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.