No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
known as Active Skill for Reading (Anderson, 2003a, 2003b, 2003c, 2003d) at elementary, preintermediate,intermediate and upper-intermediate levels. The study applied three methods in determininglexical density and readability as proposed by Halliday (1985), Ure (1971) and Flesch (1948).The analysis revealed that three of the four reading texts were of high lexical density, apart from thetext for upper-intermediate level. In terms of readability, the levels of texts corresponded to readabilitylevels. However the highest level did not entail the topmost readability. There was little evidence of anincrease of lexical density and readability in accordance with the increase of text levels as well as littleindication relating to the connections between text levels, readability and lexical density. With referenceto the methods employed, Hallidays measurement of lexical density - based on the clause - hada significant correlation with Ures measurement, and a medium relation with Fleschs Reading EaseScale, whereas Ure and Fleschs formulas showed no correlation.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 56 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.