SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Completeness of Safety Reporting in Randomized Trials
7 references·16 citing·46 second hop
Completeness of Safety Reporting in Randomized Trials (2001)Completeness of Safety Reporting in Rando…Decision Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (2009)Decision Analysis and Cost-Ef…Reporting of Adverse Effects in Clinical Trials Should Be Improved (1999)Reporting of Adverse Effects …Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (1999)Meta-Analysis, Decision Analy…Reporting of safety data from randomised trials (1998)Reporting of safety data from…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care (1995)Cumulative meta-analysis of c…Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of T…CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)CONSORT 2025 explanation and …Harms Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Interventions Aimed at Modifying Microbiota (2018)Harms Reporting in Randomized…Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Assessing the Risk of Bias of…PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews (2016)PRISMA harms checklist: impro…Publication bias in meta‐analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2015)Publication bias in meta‐anal…Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review (2014)Quality of reporting in syste…Adverse Event Reporting in Cancer Clinical Trial Publications (2013)Adverse Event Reporting in Ca…Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis (2012)Effect of editors' implementa…Meta-analyses of Adverse Effects Data Derived from Randomised Controlled Trials as Compared to Observational Studies: Methodological Overview (2011)Meta-analyses of Adverse Effe…Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review (2010)Reporting bias in medical res…Reporting of Safety Results in Published Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Reporting of Safety Results i…Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 2: Randomized Controlled Trials (2008)Evidence-Based Medicine, Syst…AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program (2008)AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessin…Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach (2007)Systematic reviews of adverse…Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies (2006)Comparison of evidence on har…Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms (2005)Challenges in Systematic Revi…Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials (2014)Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2015)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (1997)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Publication bias: what is it? How do we measure it? How do we avoid it? (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomised trials (2023)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Psychological treatments for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study (2019)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials4,099 cited
  • 1992Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction1,138 cited
  • 1999Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis925 cited
  • 1995Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care358 cited
  • 1999Reporting of Adverse Effects in Clinical Trials Should Be Improved167 cited
  • 2009Decision Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis141 cited
  • 1998Reporting of safety data from randomised trials97 cited

Cited by

  • 2016PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews555 cited
  • 2010Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review452 cited
  • 2017Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions448 cited
  • 2009Reporting of Safety Results in Published Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials288 cited
  • 2011Meta-analyses of Adverse Effects Data Derived from Randomised Controlled Trials as Compared to Observational Studies: Methodological Overview279 cited
  • 2007Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach254 cited
  • 2025CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

254 cited
  • 2012Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis238 cited
  • 2015Publication bias in meta‐analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews232 cited
  • 2006Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies228 cited
  • 2014Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review220 cited
  • 2008AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program198 cited
  • 2018Harms Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Interventions Aimed at Modifying Microbiota167 cited
  • 2008Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 2: Randomized Controlled Trials156 cited
  • 2013Adverse Event Reporting in Cancer Clinical Trial Publications155 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms147 cited