On a Method of Statistical Business-Cycle Research. A Reply

Jan Tinbergen

113 citations0/0 files storedThe Economic Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Monetary Policy and Economic Impact Economic Theory and Policy Statistical Methods and Applications

Abstract

In his polemic reply Tinbergen defends the econometric method he applied. He reproaches Keynes for the inaccuracy of his argument and justifies the applicability of linear relationships in economic analysis and their existence in economic interactions. Tinbergen also provides a detailed account of some methodological (primarily addressing the problem of causality) and economic issues of his analysis. In a comment to the Tinbergen’s paper Keynes clarifies his point of view on some particular points as well as on econometrics as a whole.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 113 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1987As Others See Us: A Case Study in Path Analysis 2003The global political economy of Israel 1988Model Validation in Spatial Econometrics: A Review and Evaluation of Alternative Approaches 2009JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS IN BRITAIN, 1895–1941 1987The ET Interview: Professor J. Tinbergen 1990Keynes, Induction, and Econometrics 2005Is There Too Little Theory in Development Economics Today 2005The first fifty years of modern econometrics

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.