Two-year resanctioning study: A comparison of restorative and traditional cautions

Abstract

This study is based on a comparison of the resanctioning rates of 29,000 offenders who had received a caution in either Thames Valley (which used restorative cautions) or two comparison forces (which used traditional cautions). The study found no evidence to suggest that restorative cautioning had resulted in a statistically significant reduction in either the overall resanctioning rate or the seriousness or frequency of offending.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.