Articlegreen2016

A Neglected Stoic Argument for Human Responsibility

35 citations0/0 files storedIllinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Augustinian Studies and Theology Biblical Studies and Interpretation Classical Philosophy and Thought

Abstract

On two separate occasions Origen attempted to defend the proposition that human beings are personally responsible for their actions. In his comprehensive exposition of Christian theology, On Principles, written about A.D. 220-25, he devoted an entire chapter to the subject of free will, in the first half of which he attempted to demonstrate on philosophical grounds that human beings are responsible for their behavior and that it is within their power (to e

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

1982Soul and Body in Stoicism 1983Origen: The Bible and Philosophy in the Third-Century Church 1951Die Stoa: Geschichte einer Geistigen Bewegung.1936Origen on first principles 1974The Stoic Conception of Fate 1890Epictet und die Stoa : Untersuchungen zur stoischen Philosophie

Cited by

2000Plato and practical politics 2000Aristotle: an introduction 2000Stoic writers of the imperial era

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.