Questioning the Use Of Race-Specific and Gender-Specific Economic Data in Tort Litigation: A Constitutional Argument

Abstract

See also Regina Austin, Employer Abuse, Worker Resistance, and the Tort of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, 41 Stan.L. Rev. 1 (1988) (examining interlocking systems of race, gender and class bias); Taunya L. Banks, Teaching Laws with Flaws: Adopting a Pluralistic Approach to Torts, 57 Mo.L. Rev. 443 (1992) (critiquing doctrine of consent); Jean C. Love, Discriminatory Speech and the Tort of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, 47 Wash.& Lee L. Rev. 123 (1990) (discussing cases of sexual, racial, ethnic, religious and sexual orientation harassment); Ann C. Shalleck, Feminist Legal Theory and the Reading of O'Brien v. Cunard, 57 Mo.L Rev. 371 (1992) (critiquing doctrine of consent).2. See, e.g.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 32 citations exist upstream.