Diabetes Topics Associated With Engagement on Twitter

Jenine K. Harris · Adelina Mart · Sarah Moreland‐Russell · Charlene A. Caburnay

38 citations0/0 files storedPreventing Chronic Disease

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Social Media in Health Education Social Media and Politics Health Literacy and Information Accessibility

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Social media are widely used by the general public and by public health and health care professionals. Emerging evidence suggests engagement with public health information on social media may influence health behavior. However, the volume of data accumulating daily on Twitter and other social media is a challenge for researchers with limited resources to further examine how social media influence health. To address this challenge, we used crowdsourcing to facilitate the examination of topics associated with engagement with diabetes information on Twitter. METHODS: We took a random sample of 100 tweets that included the hashtag "#diabetes" from each day during a constructed week in May and June 2014. Crowdsourcing through Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform was used to classify tweets into 9 topic categories and their senders into 3 Twitter user categories. Descriptive statistics and Tweedie regression were used to identify tweet and Twitter user characteristics associated with 2 measures of engagement, "favoriting" and "retweeting." RESULTS: Classification was reliable for tweet topics and Twitter user type. The most common tweet topics were medical and nonmedical resources for diabetes. Tweets that included information about diabetes-related health problems were positively and significantly associated with engagement. Tweets about diabetes prevalence, nonmedical resources for diabetes, and jokes or sarcasm about diabetes were significantly negatively associated with engagement. CONCLUSION: Crowdsourcing is a reliable, quick, and economical option for classifying tweets. Public health practitioners aiming to engage constituents around diabetes may want to focus on topics positively associated with engagement.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 38 citations exist upstream.

References

1979Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.2013A New Dimension of Health Care: Systematic Review of the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Social Media for Health Communication 2014Are Health Behavior Change Interventions That Use Online Social Networks Effective? A Systematic Review 2013Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: Motives, barriers and expectations 2012Use of Social Media in Health Promotion 2013Towards more systematic Twitter analysis: metrics for tweeting activities 2012Web 2.0 for Health Promotion: Reviewing the Current Evidence 2012Evaluating Social Media’s Capacity to Develop Engaged Audiences in Health Promotion Settings

Cited by

2016Use of Social Media in the Diabetes Community: An Exploratory Analysis of Diabetes-Related Tweets 2019#HandsOffMyADA 2021‘Falsehood flies, and the truth comes limping after it’: social media and public health 2018Information Circulation in times of Ebola: Twitter and the Sexual Transmission of Ebola by Survivors 2019Tweeting about public health policy: Social media response to the UK Government’s announcement of a Parliamentary vote on draft standardised packaging regulations

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.