Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study

2 references·10 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2018Australian code for the responsible conduct of research382 cited
2013On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers157 cited

Cited by

2021The modified lottery: Formalizing the intrinsic randomness of research funding15 cited
2020Grants: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly, and the Puzzling14 cited
2018Evaluation of stakeholder views on peer review of NIHR applications for funding: a qualitative study14 cited
2022Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences12 cited
2020Decision-making approaches used by UK and international health funding organisations for allocating research funds: A survey of current practice12 cited
2018The peer review process for awarding funds to international science research consortia: a qualitative developmental evaluation8 cited
2025Unsuccessful research funding applications: a scoping review of causes and impacts on Australian researchers and research projects5 cited
2024Exploring virtual funding committee practices in the allocation of National Institute for Health and Care Research funding: A netnographic study5 cited
2021Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives5 cited
2020Assessing health research grant applications: A retrospective comparative review of a one-stage versus a two-stage application assessment process

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

5 cited