SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Juries and Expert Evidence
0 references·12 citing·46 second hop
Juries and Expert Evidence (2001)Juries and Expert EvidenceExploring juror evaluations of expert opinions using the Expert Persuasion Expectancy framework (2020)Exploring juror evaluations o…The effect of expert witness testimony and complainant cognitive statements on mock jurors’ perceptions of rape trial testimony (2018)The effect of expert witness …Individual versus group decision making: Jurors’ reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony (2017)Individual versus group decis…The Effect of Blinded Experts on Juror Verdicts (2012)The Effect of Blinded Experts…Auditor liability: A comparison of judge and juror verdicts (2011)Auditor liability: A comparis…Enhancing fairness in DNA jury trials (2010)Enhancing fairness in DNA jur…Competition in the Courtroom: When Does Expert Testimony Improve Jurors' Decisions? (2009)Competition in the Courtroom:…Nothing But the Truth? Experiments on Adversarial Competition, Expert Testimony, and Decision Making (2008)Nothing But the Truth? Experi…Demonstrating “Reasonable Fear” at Trial: Is it Science or Junk Science? (2008)Demonstrating “Reasonable Fea…DNA and the Changing Face of Justice (2006)DNA and the Changing Face of …Expert Evidence, the Adversary System, and the Jury (2005)Expert Evidence, the Adversar…Psychological Evidence at the Dawn of the Law's Scientific Age (2004)Psychological Evidence at the…The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness (1951)Strategic Information Transmission (1982)Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections (1994)The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. (1958)The psychology of interpersonal relations. (1958)Auditor size and audit quality (1981)External auditors' willingness to rely on the work of internal auditors: The influence of work style and barriers to cooperation (2012)Can artificial intelligence reduce the effect of independence conflicts on audit firm liability? (2024)The American Jury (1971)The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process (1987)Inside the Judicial Mind (2001)Scientific Evidence and Public Policy (2005)Prosecuting from the bench? Examining sources of pro‐prosecution bias in judges (2022)Sortition as Anti‐Corruption: Popular Oversight against Elite Capture (2022)Human Information Processing and Adjudication: Trial by Heuristics (1981)Using multimedia to support jury understanding of DNA profiling evidence (2008)Exploring the Use of DNA Evidence in Homicide Investigations (2009)Providing the CSI Treatment: Criminal Justice Practitioners and the CSI Effect (2010)The Christian Science Monitor (2011)Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice (2019)The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. (1967)Studies in Ethnomethodology. (1968)Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (1986)Juror reactions to DNA evidence: Errors and expectancies. (1999)Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence? (2008)Law on Display: The Digital Transformation of Legal Persuasion and Judgment (2009)Success in Forensic Science Research and Other Collaborative Projects: Meeting Your Partners’ Expectations (2011)Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments (1988)Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment (1998)Modern scientific evidence : the law and science of expert testimony (2006)Implicit Bias and Accountability Systems: What Must Organizations Do to Prevent Discrimination? (2009)The Research-Practice Gap in I/O Psychology and Related Fields: Challenges and Potential Solutions (2012)On the general acceptance of confessions research: Opinions of the scientific community. (2018)Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. (1980)The need for cognition. (1982)Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? (2000)How expert witnesses' counterfactuals influence causal and responsibility attributions of mock jurors and expert judges (2020)Likeability and Expert Persuasion: Dislikeability Reduces the Perceived Persuasiveness of Expert Evidence (2021)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)A power primer. (1992)The role of defendant gender on juror decision-making within a mock sex trafficking case among a jury-eligible community sample (2021)The Selection of Disputes for Litigation (1984)The German Advantage in Civil Procedure (1985)The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? (1999)Why Blinding? How Blinding? A Theory of Blinding and Its Application to Institutional Corruption (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2004Psychological Evidence at the Dawn of the Law's Scientific Age49 cited
  • 2005Expert Evidence, the Adversary System, and the Jury43 cited
  • 2011Auditor liability: A comparison of judge and juror verdicts31 cited
  • 2017Individual versus group decision making: Jurors’ reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony26 cited
  • 2006DNA and the Changing Face of Justice21 cited
  • 2012The Effect of Blinded Experts on Juror Verdicts20 cited
  • 2008Nothing But the Truth? Experiments on Adversarial Competition, Expert Testimony, and Decision Making19 cited
  • 2018The effect of expert witness testimony and complainant cognitive statements on mock jurors’ perceptions of rape trial testimony17 cited
  • 2010Enhancing fairness in DNA jury trials15 cited
  • 2008Demonstrating “Reasonable Fear” at Trial: Is it Science or Junk Science?14 cited
  • 2020Exploring juror evaluations of expert opinions using the Expert Persuasion Expectancy framework14 cited
  • 2009Competition in the Courtroom: When Does Expert Testimony Improve Jurors' Decisions?13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work