How “critical” are the critical success factors (CSFs)?

2014-01-07articleBusiness Process Management Journal103 citationsgreen

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

ERP Systems Implementation and Impact Information Technology Governance and Strategy Corporate Governance and Management

Abstract

Purpose – The authors aim to examine the literature on enterprise resource planning (ERP) to establish whether the critical success factors (CSFs) for achieving stages of an ERP project have been empirically shown to be “critical”. Design/methodology/approach – The authors used a systematic approach to review 627 refereed papers published between 1998 and 2010 on ERP, from which 236 papers related to CSFs on ERP were selected for analysis. The authors employed procedures from qualitative and interpretive research methods, to analyse and interpret the material using five-step procedure of gathering, categorising, coding, analysing and comparing the data. Findings – Prior studies have identified a large number of CSFs for ERP implementation success or improved performance outcomes. The authors have shown that a limited number of CSFs have been empirically investigated for their role in, and effect on, implementation success or post-implementation performance outcomes. While reporting the factors that have some evidence to support them, the authors question the utility of the general concept of CSFs. Research limitations/implications – The authors' findings question the validity of many of the claimed CSFs and the utility of the general body of literature on CSFs. The authors caution researchers who may plan to use claimed CSFs for ERP in their research to carefully examine the veracity of the claim before proceeding. Practical implications – The findings can help managers to focus their attention, priorities, resources and leadership on managing the CSFs that have been established to be critical for achieving ERP project implementation and/or performance outcomes. Originality/value – The results provide new insights into the usefulness of CSFs and indicate that merely identifying possible CSFs is not sufficient to help with ERP success. Further investigation is required to establish the criticalness of the proposed CSFs before managerial time is devoted to them.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 103 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria

2001Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems

2002The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective

1999Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation

2002Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change

2002Enterprise resource planning: A taxonomy of critical factors

2010Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality

2003An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment

Cited by

2013Competitive advantage from ERP projects: Examining the role of key implementation drivers

2015From business process management to customer process management

2015A step-by-step performance assessment and improvement method for ERP implementation: Action case studies in Chinese companies

2015Critical success factors for different stages of business process management adoption – a case study

2016Stakeholder perceptions on critical success factors for public-private partnership projects in Nigeria

2015Identifying the drivers of enterprise resource planning and assessing its impacts on supply chain performances