SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Increase in studies of publication bias coincided with increasing use of meta-analysis.
0 references·8 citing·37 second hop
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Increase in studies of publication bias coincided with increasing use of meta-analysis. (1998)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simpl…Sexual violence against women remains problematic and highly prevalent around the world (2023)Sexual violence against women…Can public service motivation increase work engagement?—A meta-analysis across cultures (2023)Can public service motivation…Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research (2017)Systematic review finds that …Methods for detecting, quantifying, and adjusting for dissemination bias in meta-analysis are described (2016)Methods for detecting, quanti…A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity (2016)A new classification of spin …Reporting bias and other biases affecting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a methodological commentary (2006)Reporting bias and other bias…Publication Bias: A Brief Review for Clinicians (2000)Publication Bias: A Brief Rev…The Role of Meta-analysis in the Regulatory Process for Foods, Drugs, and Devices (1999)The Role of Meta-analysis in …Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Methodologic Issues in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2003)Social support modifies perceived stigmatization in the first years of mental illness: A longitudinal approach (2005)Systematic Reviews: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (2009)Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)A random‐effects regression model for meta‐analysis (1995)Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysis (1995)Availability of large-scale evidence on specific harms from systematic reviews of randomized trials (2004)Assessing evidence of environmental inequities: A meta-analysis (2005)Perfect Study, Poor Evidence: Interpretation of Biases Preceding Study Design (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evidence of “Spin” in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2017)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses (2019)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Association between statistical significance and time to publication among systematic reviews: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation (2017)Systematic reviews of the literature: a better way of addressing basic science controversies (2018)Assessing treatment effects and publication bias across different specialties in medicine: a meta-epidemiological study (2021)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Catalogue of bias: publication bias (2018)Social media use for nutrition outcomes in young adults: a mixed-methods systematic review (2018)A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering in adults: Two decades of deception detection (2019)PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT AND DISENGAGEMENT AT WORK. (1990)Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions (2000)The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art (2007)Organizational Error Tolerance and Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment and Moderating Role of Public Service Motivation (2023)How does government feel? Toward a theory of institutional pathos in public administration (2024)The Antecedents and Outcomes of Public Service Motivation: A Meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands–Resources Model (2024)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research227 cited
  • 2016A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity224 cited
  • 2000Publication Bias: A Brief Review for Clinicians172 cited
  • 1999The Role of Meta-analysis in the Regulatory Process for Foods, Drugs, and Devices101 cited
  • 2023Sexual violence against women remains problematic and highly prevalent around the world66 cited
  • 2016Methods for detecting, quantifying, and adjusting for dissemination bias in meta-analysis are described48 cited
  • 2023Can public service motivation increase work engagement?—A meta-analysis across cultures28 cited
  • 2006Reporting bias and other biases affecting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a methodological commentary14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work