SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The rise and rise of citation analysis
16 references·16 citing·36 second hopsampled
The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)The rise and rise of citation analysisWhich h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison…What do we know about the h index? (2007)What do we know about the h i…Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Three options for citation tr…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Fatal attraction: Conceptual …Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? (2005)Does the h-index for ranking …Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Citation Analysis in Research…Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfall…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals (2004)Comparing the Impact of Open …Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Impact factor: a valid measur…Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)Scholarly communication and b…Visualizing science by citation mapping (1999)Visualizing science by citati…Digital libraries and autonomous citation indexing (1999)Digital libraries and autonom…Problems of citation analysis (1996)Problems of citation analysisFortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? (1996)Fortnightly Review: How can i…Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements (2017)Measuring scientific impact b…The State of the Art of Business Process Management Research as Published in the BPM Conference (2015)The State of the Art of Busin…The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics (2014)The distorted mirror of Wikip…What makes articles highly cited? (2013)What makes articles highly ci…Representative Literature Reviews Using Constrained Snowball Sampling and Citation Network Analysis (2012)Representative Literature Rev…Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan (2012)Examining the relationship of…Non-Governmental and Not-for-Profit Organizational Effectiveness: A Modern Synthesis (2011)Non-Governmental and Not-for-…Do rankings reflect research quality? (2010)Do rankings reflect research …The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007 (2009)The decline in the concentrat…Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom‐cited influences (2009)Problems of citation analysis…Modeling a century of citation distributions (2009)Modeling a century of citatio…Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices (2009)Assessing scientific research…A follow‐up ranking of academic journals (2009)A follow‐up ranking of academ…Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry—Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts (2008)Convergent validity of biblio…Citation counting, citation ranking, and h ‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)Citation counting, citation r…An empirical investigation of the g‐index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h‐index, the A‐index, and the R‐index (2008)An empirical investigation of…Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis (2007)Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research (2018)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university (2009)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Citation Analysis: A Comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (2006)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements (2023)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 (1998)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison (2010)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers (1963)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Mapping the backbone of science (2005)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Living with the H-Index? Metric Assemblages in the Contemporary Academy (2012)A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective (2018)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation1,390 cited
  • 2002Scholarly communication and bibliometrics1,133 cited
  • 1999Visualizing science by citation mapping991 cited
  • 2005Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities886 cited
  • 2005Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods764 cited
  • 2006Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science751 cited
  • 2007Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar728 cited
  • 2007What do we know about the h index?671 cited
  • 1999Digital libraries and autonomous citation indexing607 cited
  • 2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?584 cited
  • 2004Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals525 cited
  • 1996Problems of citation analysis499 cited
  • 1996Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved?484 cited
  • 2005

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
398 cited

Cited by

  • 2008Citation counting, citation ranking, and h ‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science370 cited
  • 2011Non-Governmental and Not-for-Profit Organizational Effectiveness: A Modern Synthesis231 cited
  • 2017Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements202 cited
  • 2009Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom‐cited influences181 cited
  • 2009The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007177 cited
  • 2010Do rankings reflect research quality?171 cited
  • 2013What makes articles highly cited?148 cited
  • 2009Modeling a century of citation distributions140 cited
  • 2014The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics134 cited
  • 2012Representative Literature Reviews Using Constrained Snowball Sampling and Citation Network Analysis133 cited
  • 2009Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices130 cited
  • 2009A follow‐up ranking of academic journals124 cited
  • 2012Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan117 cited
  • 2015The State of the Art of Business Process Management Research as Published in the BPM Conference114 cited
  • 2008Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry—Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts100 cited
  • 2008An empirical investigation of the g‐index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h‐index, the A‐index, and the R‐index93 cited