SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Expert Evidence: Law and Practice
0 references·6 citing·24 second hop
Expert Evidence: Law and Practice (2020)Expert Evidence: Law and PracticeRix's Expert Psychiatric Evidence (2020)Rix's Expert Psychiatric Evid…Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence (2015)Legal versus non-legal approa…Fake or Fortune? Art Authentication Rules in the Art Market and at Court (2015)Fake or Fortune? Art Authenti…Expert Bias and Partisanship: A Comparison Between Australia and the Netherlands. (2005)Expert Bias and Partisanship:…Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (2003)Handbook of psychology in leg…Psychological evidence in the courtroom: critical reflections on the general acceptance standard (1998)Psychological evidence in the…The ecology of human development : experiments by nature and design (1979)A General Theory of Crime (1990)Forced-choice: Are forensic interviewers asking the right questions? (2001)Selecting accurate statements from the cognitive interview using confidence ratings. (2002)Workers’ Compensation and Its Potential for Perpetuation of Disability (2012)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)Archaeology of Knowledge (1970)The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. (1985)Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (2008)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Testimony: a philosophical study (1993)Testimony: A Philosophical Study. (1995)Customer Relationship Management in a Public Cloud environment - Key influencing factors for European enterprises (2017)States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order (2004)The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (2006)Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners (2016)The University of Chicago Law Review (2017)Expert Reliability in Legal Proceedings: “Eeny, Meeny, Miny, Moe, With Which Expert Should We Go?” (2020)Digital evidence: Unaddressed threats to fairness and the presumption of innocence (2021)The Expert versus the object: judging fakes and false attributions in the visual arts (2004)Against authenticity (2022)Women who Kill their Children (1979)Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (1988)The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2003Handbook of psychology in legal contexts72 cited
  • 2015Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence25 cited
  • 2005Expert Bias and Partisanship: A Comparison Between Australia and the Netherlands.16 cited
  • 2020Rix's Expert Psychiatric Evidence16 cited
  • 2015Fake or Fortune? Art Authentication Rules in the Art Market and at Court14 cited
  • 1998Psychological evidence in the courtroom: critical reflections on the general acceptance standard11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work