SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Doing justice: The choice of punishments : report of the Committee for the Study of Incarceration
0 references·16 citing·49 second hop
Doing justice: The choice of punishments : report of the Committee for the Study of Incarceration (1976)Doing justice: The choice of punishments …Retributarianism: A New Individualization of Punishment (2018)Retributarianism: A New Indiv…Punishment: Consequentialism (2010)Punishment: ConsequentialismWhy Help Offenders? Arguments for Rehabilitation as a Penal Strategy (2009)Why Help Offenders? Arguments…Accountable to what? (2009)Accountable to what?Forgiveness and Christian Ethics (2007)Forgiveness and Christian Eth…Trends in International Juvenile Justice: What Conclusions Can be Drawn? (2006)Trends in International Juven…Demystifying risk management (2006)Demystifying risk managementAN ANALYSIS OF PAROLE DECISION MAKING USING A SAMPLE OF SEX OFFENDERS: A FOCAL CONCERNS PERSPECTIVE (2006)AN ANALYSIS OF PAROLE DECISIO…Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota, 1978-2003 (2005)Sentencing Guidelines in Minn…La réforme pénale et la réciprocité des droits (2005)La réforme pénale et la récip…Configuring Security and Justice (2005)Configuring Security and Just…Policing is Not a Treatment: Alternatives to the Medical Model of Police Research (2001)Policing is Not a Treatment: …Juvenile Transfers to the Criminal Justice System: State of the Art* (1996)Juvenile Transfers to the Cri…The purposes of sentencing: Public support for competing aims (1989)The purposes of sentencing: P…Public views of sentencing: The role of offender characteristics. (1987)Public views of sentencing: T…Some Explorations in the Scaling of Penalties (1978)Some Explorations in the Scal…The Culture of Control (2001)The culture of control: crime and social order in contemporary society (2002)Why We Need a New Welfare State (2002)Juvenile Justice Systems in Europe – Reform developments between justice, welfare and ‘new punitiveness’1 (2014)1. Juvenile Justice and Crime Policy in Europe (2016)Juvenile Justice and Human Rights: European Perspectives (2016)Behavioral Study of obedience. (1963)The Human Condition (1998)Handbook of Positive Psychology (2001)Before forgiveness: the origins of a moral idea (2011)Christelike etiek in 'n sekulariserende samelewing (2014)The Economic Model of Forgiveness (2014)Governing Through Crime (2007)New visions of social control? Young people's perceptions of community penalties (2012)Balancing justice goals: restorative justice practitioners’ views (2016)The Adultification of the Youth Justice System: The Victorian Experience (2020)Sociology and Social Research (1981)A General Theory of Crime (1990)THE NEW PENOLOGY: NOTES ON THE EMERGING STRATEGY OF CORRECTIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS* (1992)The Logic of Collective Action. (1966)Taking Rights Seriously (1978)The Normative Case Study (2006)Cops as treatment providers: realities and ironies of police work in a foot patrol experiment (2013)Reflective Practitioner (2014)Improving policing by integrating craft and science: what can patrol officers teach us about good police work? (2016)Crime, Shame and Reintegration (1989)Why People Obey the Law (2006)Back to the future? The long view of probation and sentencing (2018)How Contemporary Rehabilitation Fails Youth and Sabotages the American Juvenile Justice System: A Critique and Call for Change (2019)The transformative potentials and politics of music in juvenile justice settings (2022)Punishment and Social Structure (1939)The Measurement of Delinquency. (1965)Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach (1968)Do People Really Want Punishment? On the Relationship between Acceptance of Restitution, Needs for Punishment, and Fear of Crime (1991)Gauging the Intensity of Criminal Sanctions: Developing the Criminal Punishment Severity Scale (CPSS) (1997)Looking at Penalty Scales: How Judicial Actors and the General Public Judge Penal Severity (2016)Crime and justice: An annual review of research (1983)Defiance, Deterrence, and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction (1993)Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report (1999)A Critique Of Waiver Research (2003)THE JUVENILE PENALTY: A COMPARISON OF JUVENILE AND YOUNG ADULT SENTENCING OUTCOMES IN CRIMINAL COURT* (2004)Serious, Violent, and Chronic Juvenile Offenders (2014)Say it with figures (1947)Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System. (1991)A theory of justice original editionLanguage and Symbolic Power. (1992)The Effect of Urban Neighborhood Disorder on Evaluations of the Police and Courts (2008)Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part I: Forensic intelligence (2009)Forensic Intelligence (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2006AN ANALYSIS OF PAROLE DECISION MAKING USING A SAMPLE OF SEX OFFENDERS: A FOCAL CONCERNS PERSPECTIVE124 cited
  • 2005Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota, 1978-2003102 cited
  • 2007Forgiveness and Christian Ethics95 cited
  • 2001Policing is Not a Treatment: Alternatives to the Medical Model of Police Research89 cited
  • 2009Why Help Offenders? Arguments for Rehabilitation as a Penal Strategy63 cited
  • 1996Juvenile Transfers to the Criminal Justice System: State of the Art*49 cited
  • 2005Configuring Security and Justice38 cited
  • 1978Some Explorations in the Scaling of Penalties36 cited
  • 2006Trends in International Juvenile Justice: What Conclusions Can be Drawn?33 cited
  • 2009Accountable to what?29 cited
  • 1989The purposes of sentencing: Public support for competing aims28 cited
  • 1987Public views of sentencing: The role of offender characteristics.20 cited
  • 2010Punishment: Consequentialism14 cited
  • 2018Retributarianism: A New Individualization of Punishment13 cited
  • 2006Demystifying risk management12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2005La réforme pénale et la réciprocité des droits9 cited