Human Figure Drawings

Abstract

Abstract Despite controversy, human figure drawings (HFDs) remain popular projective tools in clinical practice. Proponents believe that these techniques provide access to unconscious thoughts and experiences that the examinee would otherwise be unable or unwilling to share. Critics note that these techniques lack the standardization, reliability, validity, and normative data needed to be considered psychological tests. The history and development of HFDs are described. Psychometric evidence is reviewed, followed by an examination of current practices. Although HFDs may serve as a rapport‐building strategy for clients with limited verbal ability, no scientific evidence justifies their use in clinical assessment.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.