SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Key Stages and Considerations When Undertaking a Systematic Review: Bladder Training for the Management of Urinary Incontinence
5 references·0 citing·21 second hop
Key Stages and Considerations When Undertaking a Systematic Review: Bladder Training for the Management of Urinary Incontinence (2007)Key Stages and Considerations When Undert…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐analysis in Context (2002)Systematic Reviews in Health …Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Systematic Reviews in Health …14. Modern methods of searching the medical literature (1992)14. Modern methods of searchi…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer-review practices of psyc…Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)The Significance of Insecure and Disorganized Attachment for Children’s Internalizing Symptoms: A Meta-Analytic Study (2012)An End User Search Service in an Academic Health Sciences Library (1985)End-user programs in medical school libraries: a survey. (1988)medline ‐for‐Medics: an online searching course for health‐care professionals (1989)Methods For Evidence Synthesis in Interventional Pain Management (2003)Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993–2002 (2007)Web‐based distance learning for nurse education: a systematic review (2013)Simpson's paradox and calculation of number needed to treat from meta-analysis (2002)A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies (2007)Discrimination and drinking: A systematic review of the evidence (2016)Associations between job burnout and self-efficacy: a meta-analysis (2015)Risk factors for persistent delinquent behavior among juveniles: A meta-analytic review (2015)Perceived barriers and facilitators towards help‐seeking for eating disorders: A systematic review (2016)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
  • 2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care269 cited
  • 2002Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐analysis in Context249 cited
  • 199214. Modern methods of searching the medical literature49 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work