SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Significance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions
16 references·9 citing·37 second hop
Significance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions (2014)Significance chasing in research practice…Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)Policy: NIH plans to enhance …Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Has the Number of Scienti…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Power failure: why small samp…Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Deep impact: unintended conse…Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Why Science Is Not Necessaril…Replication studies: Bad copy (2012)Replication studies: Bad copyRegistered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex (2012)Registered Reports: A new pub…Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Retracted Science and the Ret…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive Psychology“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences (2010)“Positive” Results Increase D…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? (1989)Do studies of statistical pow…The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. (1962)The statistical power of abno…Reproducibility Failure in Biomedical Research: Problems and Solutions (2025)Reproducibility Failure in Bi…Investigating the links between questionable research practices, scientific norms and organisational culture (2024)Investigating the links betwe…Quantifying, and correcting for, the impact of questionable research practices on false discovery rates in psychological science (2023)Quantifying, and correcting f…Make like a glass frog: In support of increased transparency in herpetology (2021)Make like a glass frog: In su…The Matter of Facts (2020)The Matter of FactsPersonal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices (2020)Personal Motivations and Syst…An evaluation of the practice of transparency and reproducibility in addiction medicine literature (2020)An evaluation of the practice…Four erroneous beliefs thwarting more trustworthy research (2019)Four erroneous beliefs thwart…Ten reasons why journals must review manuscripts before results are known (2014)Ten reasons why journals must…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation (2017)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science (2012)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Sample Size Justification (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Design of Experiments (1936)Belief in the law of small numbers. (1971)A Mixed Methods Investigation of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social and Health Science Research (2007)The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis (2013)Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research (2017)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The New Statistics (2013)Essentials of Psychological Testing (1960)Sensitivity and Attachment: A Meta-Analysis on Parental Antecedents of Infant Attachment (1997)Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research (2011)A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research (2015)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
  • 1962The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.1,824 cited
  • 2014Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility1,247 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 1989Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies?748 cited
  • 2010“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences733 cited
  • 2012Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex572 cited
  • 2012Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting563 cited
  • 2013Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank440 cited
  • 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
  • 2012Replication studies: Bad copy407 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices51 cited
    • 2014Ten reasons why journals must review manuscripts before results are known32 cited
    • 2020An evaluation of the practice of transparency and reproducibility in addiction medicine literature26 cited
    • 2020The Matter of Facts22 cited
    • 2024Investigating the links between questionable research practices, scientific norms and organisational culture22 cited
    • 2019Four erroneous beliefs thwarting more trustworthy research15 cited
    • 2023Quantifying, and correcting for, the impact of questionable research practices on false discovery rates in psychological science10 cited
    • 2025Reproducibility Failure in Biomedical Research: Problems and Solutions8 cited
    • 2021Make like a glass frog: In support of increased transparency in herpetology7 cited