SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of a peer review
0 references·13 citing·42 second hop
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of a peer review (2013)Effect of blinding and unmasking on the q…Understanding and supporting anonymity policies in peer review (2016)Understanding and supporting …Blind Peer Review by Academic Journals (2016)Blind Peer Review by Academic…Use of politeness strategies in signed open peer review (2014)Use of politeness strategies …The Critical Role of Institutional Services in Open Access Advocacy (2013)The Critical Role of Institut…A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review (2012)A Kuhnian Critique of Psychom…Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy (2011)Cooperation between Referees …The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal (2009)The effect of masking manuscr…Efecto de la revisión estadística en la calidad de los manuscritos publicados en MEDICINA CLÍNICA: estudio aleatorizado (2003)Efecto de la revisión estadís…Accuracy in the Identification of Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Journals and the Peer-Review Process Across Disciplines (2003)Accuracy in the Identificatio…Between Printed Past and Digital Future (2002)Between Printed Past and Digi…Referees’ Attitudes toward Open Peer Review and Electronic Transmission of Papers (2001)Referees’ Attitudes toward Op…La revisión por pares en las revistas científicas (2001)La revisión por pares en las …The New Millennium: time for a change! (2000)The New Millennium: time for …The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage (1987)Politeness (1987)Open Peer Review (2020)Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)The ethics of peer review in bioethics (2013)Which peer reviewers voluntarily reveal their identity to authors? Insights into the consequences of open-identities peer review (2021)US and Non-US Submissions (1998)Subjective Performance and the Value of Blind Evaluation (2011)Submission letters for academic publication: Disciplinary differences and promotional language (2014)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)O processo de revisão por pares: uma revisão integrativa de literatura (2012)Is the Gender Climate in Chemistry Still Chilly? Changes in the Last Decade and the Long-Term Impact of COACh-Sponsored Workshops (2018)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Procesos de revisión y de edición en Medicina Clínica (2005)Towards the enhancement of quality publication practices in clinical psychological science (2019)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)The Transformation of the Green Road to Open Access (2023)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Winners don’t punish (2008)The four pillars of scholarly publishing: The future and a foundation (2014)An Open Science Peer Review Oath (2015)Does open peer review improve citation count? Evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of PeerJ (2020)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Essential Tension (1977)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)On the Nature and Role of Peer Review in Mathematics (2016)When Zero May Not Be Zero: A Cautionary Note on the Use of Inter-Rater Reliability in Evaluating Grant Peer Review (2021)Towards theorizing peer review (2022)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)WITHDRAWN - Mixed Methods Sampling (2007)MOPRD: A multidisciplinary open peer review dataset (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2012A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review42 cited
  • 2011Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy35 cited
  • 2009The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal32 cited
  • 2003Accuracy in the Identification of Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Journals and the Peer-Review Process Across Disciplines23 cited
  • 2014Use of politeness strategies in signed open peer review22 cited
  • 2001Referees’ Attitudes toward Open Peer Review and Electronic Transmission of Papers20 cited
  • 2003Efecto de la revisión estadística en la calidad de los manuscritos publicados en MEDICINA CLÍNICA: estudio aleatorizado20 cited
  • 2001La revisión por pares en las revistas científicas15 cited
  • 2016Understanding and supporting anonymity policies in peer review14 cited
  • 2013The Critical Role of Institutional Services in Open Access Advocacy13 cited
  • 2016Blind Peer Review by Academic Journals13 cited
  • 2000The New Millennium: time for a change!13 cited
  • 2002Between Printed Past and Digital Future12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work