Lay Perceptions of Selection Decision Aids in US and Non-US Samples

Dalia L. Diab · Shuang-Yueh Pui · Maya Yankelevich · Scott Highhouse

120 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Employer Branding and e-HRM Psychometric Methodologies and Testing AI and HR Technologies

Abstract

Understanding why decision makers resist using standardized approaches to employee selection requires understanding basic feelings and beliefs about different approaches for collecting and combining assessment information. This study examines lay perceptions of selection decision aids, using a sample of 418 working adults. Holding constant the attributes measured, participants from the United States perceive holistic integration to be superior to mechanical integration for combining interview scores, as well as for combining test scores. Participants from outside of the United States prefer holistic integration of interview scores, but slightly prefer mechanical integration of test scores.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 120 citations exist upstream.

References

1993Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology 1995What Theory is Not 1991Toward a general theory of expertise : prospects and limits 2006Transformational Leadership and Job Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Core Job Characteristics 1990Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology.2010Rational choice in an uncertain world the psychology of judgment and decision making 2004Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta‐Analysis 2008Stubborn Reliance on Intuition and Subjectivity in Employee Selection

Cited by

2020Slow response times undermine trust in algorithmic (but not human) predictions 2021A survey of human judgement and quantitative forecasting methods 2022Should I Trust the Artificial Intelligence to Recruit? Recruiters’ Perceptions and Behavior When Faced With Algorithm-Based Recommendation Systems During Resume Screening 2014“With recruitment I always feel I need to listen to my gut”: the role of intuition in employee selection 2020Implementing evidence-based assessment and selection in organizations: A review and an agenda for future research

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.