SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions
0 references·16 citing·47 second hop
Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions (2009)Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wr…Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence (2023)Wrongful convictions and clai…(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science (2020)(Mis)use of scientific measur…Public Beliefs About the Accuracy and Importance of Forensic Evidence in the United States (2019)Public Beliefs About the Accu…Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices (2019)Communicating forensic scienc…Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook (2019)Assessing Cognitive Bias in F…Jurors’ perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility (2018)Jurors’ perceptions of forens…A systematic analysis of misleading evidence in unsafe rulings in England and Wales (2017)A systematic analysis of misl…Science in the court: pitfalls, challenges and solutions (2015)Science in the court: pitfall…Paradigms of forensic science and legal process: a critical diagnosis (2015)Paradigms of forensic science…Critical review of forensic trace evidence analysis and the need for a new approach (2015)Critical review of forensic t…The communication of forensic science in the criminal justice system: A review of theory and proposed directions for research (2014)The communication of forensic…Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide. (2013)Using Brain Imaging for Lie D…How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment (2013)How Jurors Evaluate Fingerpri…Scientific Evidence in Europe -- Admissibility, Evaluation and Equality of Arms (2011)Scientific Evidence in Europe…If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony (2011)If the Shoe Fits They Might A…Forensic identification: From a faith-based “Science” to a scientific science (2010)Forensic identification: From…A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework (1998)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Evaluating the evidentiary value of the analysis of skeletal trauma in forensic research: A review of research and practice (2020)Scientometric evaluation of highly cited scientists in the field of forensic science and legal medicine (2021)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (1996)Expressing the value of forensic science in policing (2016)Lifestyle chemistries from phones for individual profiling (2016)Crime reconstruction and the role of trace materials from crime scene to court (2019)Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (1994)Communication Theory as a Field (1999)The structure and function of communication in society (2007)‘Sometimes I give up on the report and ring the scientist': bridging the gap between what forensic scientists write and what police investigators read (2015)Discord in the Communication of Forensic Science (2016)The forensic disclosure model: What should be disclosed to, and by, forensic experts? (2019)Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications (2005)Minimum requirements for application of ink dating methods based on solvent analysis in casework (2011)Practical relevance of pattern uniqueness in forensic science (2013)The identification of living persons on images: A literature review (2016)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)A cultural change to enable improved decision-making in forensic science: A six phased approach (2019)Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2019)Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions 2016–2019 (2020)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Explaining the Evidence: How the Mind Investigates the World (2021)The distinction between discriminability and reliability in forensic science (2021)Shifting decision thresholds can undermine the probative value and legal utility of forensic pattern-matching evidence (2023)The Content Analysis Guidebook (2017)Beyond CSI: Calibrating public beliefs about the reliability of forensic science through openness and transparency (2022)The logic of forensic pathology opinion (2022)Human Factors in Forensic Science (2023)The logic of scientific discovery (1959)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. (1962)Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: “Inconclusive” decisions and the structure of error rate studies (2021)Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners (2022)Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities (2008)Prospects of functional magnetic resonance imaging as lie detector (2013)On the reality of cognitive illusions. (1996)Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity (2002)Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (2008)A transparent approach: Openness in forensic science reporting (2024)Beyond Discrimination: Generative AI Applications and Ethical Challenges in Forensic Psychiatry (2024)Towards a forensic semiotics (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2013Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide.108 cited
  • 2020(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science83 cited
  • 2017A systematic analysis of misleading evidence in unsafe rulings in England and Wales67 cited
  • 2015Critical review of forensic trace evidence analysis and the need for a new approach66 cited
  • 2023Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence62 cited
  • 2010Forensic identification: From a faith-based “Science” to a scientific science49 cited
  • 2019Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices49 cited
  • 2015Science in the court: pitfalls, challenges and solutions46 cited
  • 2014The communication of forensic science in the criminal justice system: A review of theory and proposed directions for research44 cited
  • 2019Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook42 cited
  • 2019Public Beliefs About the Accuracy and Importance of Forensic Evidence in the United States41 cited
  • 2011If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony39 cited
  • 2018Jurors’ perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility38 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2013How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment37 cited
  • 2011Scientific Evidence in Europe -- Admissibility, Evaluation and Equality of Arms34 cited
  • 2015Paradigms of forensic science and legal process: a critical diagnosis32 cited