SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Analyzing the Reliability of Supreme Court Justices' Agenda-Setting Records
16 references·1 citing·44 second hop
Analyzing the Reliability of Supreme Court Justices' Agenda-Setting Records (2009)Analyzing the Reliability of Supreme Cour…The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting (2009)The Separation of Powers and …Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence (2009)Agenda Setting in the Supreme…Sorcerers' apprentices: 100 years of law clerks at the United States Supreme Court (2007)Sorcerers' apprentices: 100 y…Answering the call of the Court: how justices and litigants set the Supreme Court agenda (2007)Answering the call of the Cou…The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court (2006)The Influence of Oral Argumen…Measurement of Observer Agreement (2003)Measurement of Observer Agree…Sophisticated voting and gate-keeping in the supreme court (1999)Sophisticated voting and gate…Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions (1997)Explaining Federal Bureaucrat…Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court (1997)Amicus Curiae and the Role of…Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers: Aggressive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vinson Court (1995)Supreme Court Justices as Str…Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. (1993)Deciding to Decide: Agenda Se…Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court (1988)Organized Interests and Agend…Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court (1981)Case Selection in the United …The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…Looking Back to Move Forward: Quantifying Policy Predictions in Political Decision Making (2012)Looking Back to Move Forward:…Theory of Mental Tests (1950)Theory and Methods of Scaling (1958)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. (2005)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Friends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation (2004)Signals from the Tenth Justice: The Political Role of the Solicitor General in Supreme Court Decision Making (2004)Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research (2012)Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2019)The Art of Political Manipulation, by William H. Riker (1987)Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices (1989)Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals (2003)Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership (2008)Why (And When) Judges Dissent: A Theoretical And Empirical Analysis (2011)An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers (1977)High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes (1990)Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online (2006)Mining Marketing Meaning from Online Chatter: Strategic Brand Analysis of Big Data Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (2014)The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales: A Meta-Analytic Review of Platform, Product, and Metric Factors (2015)Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change (1974)Strategic Information Transmission (1982)Information and Legislative Organization (1991)Three's a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement (2006)Lobbyists before the U.S. Supreme Court (2007)The Supreme Court and Opinion Content (2007)The choices justices make (1997)Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 (2002)The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited (2003)Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court? (2009)The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto (2014)Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics (1983)The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes (1991)Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts (1997)Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review (2001)Supreme Court Decision Making (2005)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions (2000)Getting in the Door: Sampling and Completing Elite Interviews (2002)Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 1968Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.8,719 cited
  • 2003Measurement of Observer Agreement1,494 cited
  • 1988Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court439 cited
  • 1993Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court.273 cited
  • 1997Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court231 cited
  • 2006The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court202 cited
  • 2009Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence180 cited
  • 1999Sophisticated voting and gate-keeping in the supreme court169 cited
  • 1981Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court154 cited
  • 2007Sorcerers' apprentices: 100 years of law clerks at the United States Supreme Court142 cited
  • 1995Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers: Aggressive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vinson Court134 cited
  • 2009The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting101 cited
  • 1997Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

92 cited
  • 2007Answering the call of the Court: how justices and litigants set the Supreme Court agenda67 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2012Looking Back to Move Forward: Quantifying Policy Predictions in Political Decision Making10 cited