Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

What Happens in the Field Stays in the Field: Exploring Whether Professionals Play Minimax in Laboratory Experiments

12 references·16 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1928Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele2,580 cited
2005Do Professional Traders Exhibit Myopic Loss Aversion? An Experimental Analysis754 cited
2004The Hidden Costs and Returns of Incentives—Trust and Trustworthiness among Ceos517 cited
1999Experimental Economics From the Vantage‐point of Behavioural Economics422 cited
2002Testing Mixed-Strategy Equilibria When Players Are Heterogeneous: The Case of Penalty Kicks in Soccer415 cited
2001Minimax Play at Wimbledon383 cited
2003Professionals Play Minimax329 cited
1987Nonmetric test of the minimax theory of two-person zerosum games.266 cited
1992Generation of random series in two-person strictly competitive games.220 cited
1990Testing the Minimax Hypothesis: A Re-Examination of O'Neill's Game Experiment173 cited
2008Experientia Docet: Professionals Play Minimax in Laboratory Experiments134 cited
1967Interdependent decision strategies in zero-sum games: A computer-controlled study58 cited

Cited by

2021Strategic interactions between humans and artificial intelligence: Lessons from experiments with computer players72 cited
20167. Experimental Economics across Subject Populations62 cited
2013

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

STEREOTYPE THREAT AND THE STUDENT‐ATHLETE

60 cited

2014Assessing the Correspondence between Experimental Results Obtained in the Lab and Field: A Review of Recent Social Science Research51 cited

2014The role of self-interest in elite bargaining47 cited

2012Pattern recognition and subjective belief learning in a repeated constant-sum game45 cited

2020Challenges in Recruiting U.S. Farmers for Policy‐Relevant Economic Field Experiments45 cited

2017A novel approach to studying strategic decisions with eye-tracking and machine learning30 cited

2013Do Pharmacists Buy Bayer? Sophisticated Shoppers and the Brand Premium29 cited

2016Focality and Asymmetry in Multi-Battle Contests22 cited

2010Testing the TASP: An experimental investigation of learning in games with unstable equilibria21 cited

2016TRUST, TRUSTWORTHINESS, AND BUSINESS SUCCESS: LAB AND FIELD FINDINGS FROM ENTREPRENEURS19 cited

2022Participation in Competitive Sports Closes Gender Gaps in Competition and in Risk Taking18 cited

2013Beyond fictitious play beliefs: Incorporating pattern recognition and similarity matching17 cited

2012Strategic adaptation of humans playing computer algorithms in a repeated constant-sum game17 cited

2019A Sharp Test of the Portability of Expertise8 cited