The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance in Korea

2015-05-01articleEmerging Markets Finance and Trade88 citationsclosed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Corporate Identity and Reputation Corporate Governance and Financial Management

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate financial performance (CFP) for the period 2004–2010 in Korea. This study performs difference generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation on a dynamic panel model. The results for the entire industry show CSR has a positive effect on CFP in Korea, and the stakeholder theory seems valid. Industry analysis shows different results by each industry’s characteristics. The results also reveal the effect of CSR on CFP did not increase after the global financial crisis. The results suggest companies should improve CFP by taking a strategic approach to CSR.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 88 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations

1997THE CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE LINK

2015World Development indicators

2003Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business

2006How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions

2010The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice

2000Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?

2001Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?

Cited by

2022Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The case in Vietnam

2017Twenty Years of Research on the Relationship Between Economic and Social Performance: A Meta-analysis Approach

2021More cooperative ... more competitive? Improving competitiveness by sharing value through the supply chain