Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Assigning publications to multiple subject categories for bibliometric analysis

11 references·3 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact448 cited
2012The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation444 cited
2002Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?251 cited
2012The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits201 cited
2011Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents190 cited
2012The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011179 cited
2013How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top‐cited papers87 cited
2011A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating the Predictive Validity of Editorial Decisions: Do the Editors of a High Profile Journal Select Manuscripts that are Highly Cited After Publication?82 cited
2011Basic properties of both percentile rank scores and the I3 indicator58 cited
2012Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them25 cited
2013Uncertainties and ambiguities in percentiles and how to avoid them19 cited

Cited by

2015Bibliometric analysis for the literature of traditional Chinese medicine in PubMed16 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2013

What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCI mago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking

13 cited

2015Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: A quantitative approach based on barycenters11 cited