Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Individual Differences in the Context‐Dependent Recruitment of Cognitive Control: Evidence From Action Versus State Orientation

10 references·5 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005An automated version of the operation span task1,861 cited
1986Progress in Experimental Personality Research1,521 cited
1994Volition and Personality: Action Versus State Orientation806 cited
2000A Functional-Design Approach to Motivation and Self-Regulation735 cited
2006Self and relationships: connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes581 cited
2011Combining Speed and Accuracy in Cognitive Psychology: Is the Inverse Efficiency Score (IES) a Better Dependent Variable than the Mean Reaction Time (RT) and the Percentage Of Errors (PE)?574 cited
2008Audio-visual integration of emotion expression353 cited
2011The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis.318 cited
2014Action Versus State Orientation and Self-Control Performance After Depletion89 cited
2012Do Demanding Conditions Help or Hurt Self‐Regulation?79 cited

Cited by

2019Thinking in action: Need for Cognition predicts Self-Control together with Action Orientation33 cited
2021In the self-control and self-regulation maze: Integration and importance29 cited
2022Are you confident enough to act? Individual differences in action control are associated with post-decisional metacognitive bias10 cited
2023Action‐orientation shields against primed cognitive conflict effects on effort‐related cardiac response

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

10 cited

2020Predicting self-control capacity – Taking into account working memory capacity, motivation, and heart rate variability8 cited