A good normalized impact and concentration measure

Leo Egghe

8 citations0/0 files storedJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

It is shown that a normalized version of the g‐index is a good normalized impact and concentration measure. A proposal for such a measure by Bartolucci is improved.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output 2006Theory and practise of the g-index 1905Methods of Measuring the Concentration of Wealth 2007The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index 2005Power Laws in the Information Production Process: Lotkaian Informetrics 2005Zipfian and Lotkaian continuous concentration theory 2009An econometric property of the g-index 2012Remarks on the paper by A . De V isscher, “what does the g‐index really measure?”

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.