SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: past and future
13 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: past and future (2013)Cochrane systematic reviews in the field …Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: What's there and what should be (2010)Cochrane systematic reviews i…Why are Cochrane hepato-biliary reviews undervalued by physicians as an aid for clinical decision-making? (2009)Why are Cochrane hepato-bilia…Does direction of results of abstracts submitted to scientific conferences on drug addiction predict full publication? (2009)Does direction of results of …An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist (2009)An international survey indic…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal* (2007)The quality of reports of cri…How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs? (2007)How useful are Cochrane revie…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Empty systematic reviews: hidden perils and lessons learned (2007)Empty systematic reviews: hid…Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Neonatal Reviews: A systematic analysis (2006)Conclusiveness of the Cochran…Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study (2005)Assessment of methodological …Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998 (2001)Quality of Cochrane reviews: …Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation (2000)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology – A systematic review (2009)The Value of “Traditional” Reviews in the Era of Systematic Reviewing (2009)Twenty Years of Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery: Has Quality Kept Up with Quantity? (2010)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies (2010)Ítems de referencia para publicar Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: La Declaración PRISMA (2014)Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)High quality of evidence is uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (2017)Should low-quality evidence dominate high-level evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of musculoskeletal physical therapy interventions (2020)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2007)Is compensation “bad for health”? A systematic meta-review (2010)Is there a solution to publication bias? Researchers call for changes in dissemination of clinical research results (2014)Half of systematic reviews about pain registered in PROSPERO were not published and the majority had inaccurate status (2019)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Mind-Body Medicine: State of the Science, Implications for Practice (2003)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials (2009)Realizing an effectiveness revolution in environmental management (2011)The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative: Its Role in Improving Cochrane Reviews (2012)Systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2015)Reading, writing and systematic review (2008)Text‐in‐context: a method for extracting findings in mixed‐methods mixed research synthesis studies (2012)Interventions for Secondary Traumatic Stress With Mental Health Workers (2014)Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine. (2005)High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews (2005)Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four‐item checklist (2017)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2000Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation263 cited
  • 2005Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study239 cited
  • 2001Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998159 cited
  • 2007Empty systematic reviews: hidden perils and lessons learned115 cited
  • 2007The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal*112 cited
  • 2009An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist64 cited
  • 2007How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs?56 cited
  • 2006Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Neonatal Reviews: A systematic analysis29 cited
  • 2010Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: What's there and what should be26 cited
  • 2009Does direction of results of abstracts submitted to scientific conferences on drug addiction predict full publication?21 cited
  • 2009Why are Cochrane hepato-biliary reviews undervalued by physicians as an aid for clinical decision-making?17 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work