Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications

Luciana Duranti

100 citations0/0 files storedArchivaria

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Digital and Traditional Archives Management Information Science and Libraries Data Analysis and Archiving

Abstract

This article defines the concepts of reliability and authenticity and their relationship, illustrates what makes records reliable and authentic, warns against the danger of emphasizing one concept over the other, and suggests the direction that research on electronic records should take. RÉSUMÉ Cet article définit les concepts de fiabilité et d'authenticité ainsi que leurs rapports mutuels. L'article illustre aussi les éléments constitutifs de la fiabilité et de l'authenticité et prévient le risque de surestimer l'un des deux concepts aux dépens de l'autre et suggère finalement quelques pistes de recherches souhaitables pour les documents informatisés.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 100 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2012Digital Preservation, Archival Science and Methodological Foundations for Digital Libraries 2001Double fold: libraries and the assault on paper 2007Constructions of Authenticity 2005Electronic records management 2002Afterglow: Conceptions of record and evidence in archival discourse 2013Trust and context in cyberspace 2009Towards establishing a framework for managing trusted records in the electronic environment 2011Archival quality and long-term preservation: a research framework for validating the usefulness of digital surrogates

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.