SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessments of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in I nternational J ournal of U rology from 1994 to 2011
13 references·2 citing·36 second hop
Assessments of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in I nternational J ournal of U rology from 1994 to 2011 (2013)Assessments of the quality of randomized …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Reliability of 3 Assessment Tools Used to Evaluate Randomized Controlled Trials for Treatment of Neck Pain (2011)Reliability of 3 Assessment T…Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Korean Journal of Urology Over the Past 20 Years (2011)Quality Assessment of Randomi…Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine (2009)Quality Assessment of Randomi…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Validity of the Impact Factor of Journals as a Measure of Randomized Controlled Trial Quality (2006)Validity of the Impact Factor…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003)Updated Method Guidelines for…Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Value of Flow Diagrams in Rep…Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials (1999)Assessing the Quality of Rand…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Evaluation of the reporting quality of observational studies in master of public health dissertations in China (2020)Evaluation of the reporting q…Analysis of randomized controlled trials in Rheumatology International from 1981 to 2012: methodological assessment (2014)Analysis of randomized contro…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT Revised—Improving the Reporting of Randomized Trials (2001)A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (2004)The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study (2009)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Interrater Reliability of the Modified Jadad Quality Scale for Systematic Reviews of Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Trials (2001)Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)An overview and analysis of journal operations, journal publication patterns, and journal impact in school psychology and related fields (2011)Quality of randomised controlled trials in dentistry (2011)Randomized clinical trials of dental bleaching – Compliance with the CONSORT Statement: a systematic review (2017)Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review (2007)2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group (2009)The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2003Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group2,179 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 1999Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials649 cited
  • 2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials316 cited
  • 2006Validity of the Impact Factor of Journals as a Measure of Randomized Controlled Trial Quality35 cited
  • 2011Reliability of 3 Assessment Tools Used to Evaluate Randomized Controlled Trials for Treatment of Neck Pain25 cited
  • 2009Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine15 cited
  • 2011Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Korean Journal of Urology Over the Past 20 Years12 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2020
Evaluation of the reporting quality of observational studies in master of public health dissertations in China
8 cited
  • 2014Analysis of randomized controlled trials in Rheumatology International from 1981 to 2012: methodological assessment7 cited