Phi theory : phi-features across modules and interfaces

Daniel Harbour · David Adger · Susana Béjar

130 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation Phonetics and Phonology Research Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis

Abstract

1. Why Phi? 2. Features on Bound Pronouns 3. On the Semantic Markedness of Phi Features 4. Phi-Agree and Theta-Related Case 5. Conditions on Phi-Agree 6. Phi Feature Competition in Morphology and Syntax 7. Discontinuous Agreement and the Syntax Morphology Interface 8. Third Person Marking in Menominee 9. When is a Syncretism More Than a Syncretism? 10. Where's Phi? Agreement as a Post Syntactic Operation 11. Cross-Modular Parallels in the Study of Phon and Phi

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 130 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2011The typology of morphological ergativity in Neo-Aramaic 2009Variable rules meet Impoverishment theory: Patterns of agreement leveling in English varieties 2010On the relationship between morphological and semantic markedness 2010Semantics and the objects of assertion 2011Clitic placement in Spanish–English bilingual children 2010Gender markedness: the anatomy of a counter-example 2013Explaining the structure of case paradigms by the mechanisms of Nanosyntax 2017Sign Language and the Foundations of Anaphora

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.