Digitalization and Promotion: An Empirical Study in a Large Law Firm

Marion Brivot · Helen Lam · Yves Gendron

28 citations0/0 files storedBritish Journal of Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Knowledge Management and Sharing Human Resource and Talent Management Legal Systems and Judicial Processes

Abstract

In law firms, the number of hours that associates work reportedly plays a preponderant role in promotion decisions. We build on previous research in this area by distinguishing the effect of ‘development hours’ from ‘billable hours’ on promotions and by assessing the extent to which billable hours are still important criteria today, in digitalized environments where efficiency is, presumably, likely to matter more than working long hours. We also examine whether certain types of behaviours, like associates' interactions with technology, may be associated directly or indirectly with a higher likelihood of promotion. We studied these questions in the context of a large corporate law firm in continentalEurope, focusing on the promotion of 93 lawyers between 2005 and 2010. We found that both billable and development hours are still significant positive predictors of promotions and that associates' ability to use the case firm's computer‐mediated knowledge management system productively is indirectly rewarded by promotion. This research reasserts the fundamental role of billable hours as one of the primary means for evaluating lawyers' work and suggests that using knowledge management systems gives associates an edge in the race for promotion, particularly in law firms moving along the ‘evolutionary path’ of legal service, from bespoke to commoditized work (Susskind, R. (2010).The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services. Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

References

1983The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields 2004The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields 1995The Knowledge-Creating Company 1998The Knowledge-Creating Company 1983The Iron Caged Revisited : Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields 1999What's your strategy for managing knowledge?200810 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization 2007Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization

Cited by

2019Rethinking professionalization: A generative dialogue on CSR practitioners1 2018Organizational working time regimes: Drivers, consequences and attempts to change patterns of excessive working hours 2020Digital innovation in law firms: The dominant logic under threat 2022Automation Anxiety and Augmentation Aspiration: Subtexts of the Future of Work 2020Information systems and information technologies as enablers of innovation and knowledge creation and sharing in professional service firms

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.