No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Abstract: Under many protocols—in computerized settings and in economics settings—participants repeatedly “best respond ” to each others ’ actions until the system “converges ” to an equilibrium point. We ask when does such myopic “local rationality ” imply “global rationality”, i.e., when is it best for a player, given that the others are repeatedly best-responding, to also repeatedly best-respond? We exhibit a class of games where this is indeed the case. We identify several environments of interest that fall within our class: models of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) [7], that handles routing on the Internet, and of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) [5], and also stable-roommates [3] and cost-sharing [9, 10], that have been extensively studied in economic theory. Keywords:best response, mechanism design, incentive compatible dynamics. 1
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 39 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.