Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Factors which may bias judges’ decisions to exclude accounting expert witnesses testimony

10 references·3 citing·48 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2002Experimental research in financial accounting1,213 cited
1979Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view.509 cited
2003The Effect of Information Complexity on Analysts' Use of That Information377 cited
1992Readability and Understandability: Different Measures of the Textual Complexity of Accounting Narrative267 cited
2002What's Gender Got to Do with It? Incivility in the Federal Courts189 cited
2000The effect of experience and complexity on order and recency bias in decision making by professional accountants83 cited
2016THE EFFECTS OF MONETARY INCENTIVES ON EFFORT AND DECISION PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF COGNITIVE CHARACTERISTICS60 cited
2008Bias in Judicial Citations: A Window into the Behavior of Judges?59 cited
2012Is Forensic Accounting in the United States Becoming a Profession50 cited
2012The Use of Forensic Accounting Experts in Tax Cases as Identified in Court Opinions19 cited

Cited by

2024Obstacles Facing the Development of Forensic Accounting Curricula within Australian Universities: Exploring Perspectives of Practitioners and Educators20 cited
2020A Synthesis of Non-Fraud Forensic Accounting Research18 cited
2022Les effets des caractéristiques démographiques des arbitres sur les sentences arbitrales dans le secteur universitaire canadien3 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work