References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2000The quality of forensic psychological assessments, reports, and testimony: Acknowledging the gap between promise and practice.120 cited
• 2002Child custody cases: A content analysis of evaluations in practice.59 cited
• 2010The Gender Paradigm in Family Court Processes: Re-balancing the Scales of Justice From Biased Social Science57 cited
• 2006Domestic Abuse Assessment in Child Custody Disputes: Beware the Domestic Violence Research Paradigm51 cited
• 1997Psychologists' ratings of the best-interests-of-the-child custody and access criterion: A family systems assessment model.39 cited
• 2008The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and practice part II: The information website of the American Bar Association34 cited
• 2008Evidence Base of Custody and Access Evaluations31 cited
• 1999MMPI-2 validity scales in child custody evaluations: clinical versus statistical significance30 cited
• 2005Practice Guidelines In Child Custody Evaluations for Licensed Clinical Social Workers30 cited
• 2017Custodia compartida, corresponsabilidad parental y justicia terapéutica como nuevo paradigma27 cited
• 1999SCIENTIFICALLY CRAFTED CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS26 cited
• 2004Psychologists' Practices Compared to the Expectations of Family Law Judges and Attorneys in Child Custody Cases24 cited
• 2004The Investigation Component in Forensic Mental Health Evaluations