SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic reviews : synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions
0 references·16 citing·56 second hopsampled
Systematic reviews : synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions (1998)Systematic reviews : synthesis of best ev…Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions (2020)Inter-organizational collabor…Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance (2020)Development, testing and use …Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality (2014)Systematic reviews published …How to write a review article? (2014)How to write a review article?Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals (2013)Risk of bias of randomized co…Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm? (2012)Cochrane and non-Cochrane sys…Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 7: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2009)Evidence-Based Medicine, Syst…Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)Evidence-Based Medicine, Syst…The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health (2006)The process of systematic rev…An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall (2006)An alternative to the hand se…Evidence-based public health: what does it offer developing countries? (2005)Evidence-based public health:…Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations (2004)Systematic reviews in laborat…Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry (2004)Survey of systematic reviews …Meta-regression Approaches: What, Why, When, and How? (2004)Meta-regression Approaches: W…Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline? (2003)Should meta-analysts search E…Examining the Evidence in Anesthesia Literature: A Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews (2001)Examining the Evidence in Ane…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies (2007)Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies (2010)Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? (2013)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement (2016)Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer (2018)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)“Publish or Perish” Promotes Medical Literature Quantity Over Quality (2018)An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Orthopaedic Surgery Journals (2018)The Robustness of Trials That Guide Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Surgery (2018)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)The Value of “Traditional” Reviews in the Era of Systematic Reviewing (2009)A review of protective factors and causal mechanisms that enhance the mental health of Indigenous Circumpolar youth (2013)Collaborative forecasting in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework (2014)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies (2005)Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency (2006)The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews (2013)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)High quality of the evidence for medical and other health-related interventions was uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews (2016)Overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews on exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional analysis using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool (2019)Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1998)Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions (2003)Guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. (2005)Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence (2006)Experience of sexual violence among women in HIV discordant unions after voluntary HIV counselling and testing: a qualitative critical incident study in Uganda (2009)Representation of Developing Countries in Orthopaedic Journals: A Survey of Four Influential Orthopaedic Journals (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Facts, Fallacies, and Politics of Comparative Effectiveness Research: Part 2 - Implications for Interventional Pain Management (2010)Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010: Reforming the Health Care Reform for the New Decade (2011)Systematic Reviews in Dental Research. A Guideline (2012)Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage (1991)Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage (2004)Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance (2007)Post-entry internationalization speed of SMEs: The role of relational mechanisms and foreign market knowledge (2020)Mapping the literature on financial well‐being: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (2021)Inter-organisational Cooperation Oriented Towards Sustainability Involving SMEs: a Systematic Literature Review (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Validity of data extraction in evidence synthesis practice of adverse events: reproducibility study (2022)Health financing challenges in Southeast Asian countries for universal health coverage: a systematic review (2023)Updates on digital mental health interventions for children and young people: systematic overview of reviews (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2008Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies167 cited
  • 2003Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline?160 cited
  • 2020Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance149 cited
  • 2020Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions145 cited
  • 2006The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health139 cited
  • 2006An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall133 cited
  • 2005Evidence-based public health: what does it offer developing countries?115 cited
  • 2014Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality112 cited
  • 2012Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?95 cited
  • 2013Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals83 cited
  • 2014How to write a review article?75 cited
  • 2001Examining the Evidence in Anesthesia Literature: A Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews75 cited
  • 2004Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

71 cited
  • 2004Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations65 cited
  • 2004Meta-regression Approaches: What, Why, When, and How?59 cited
  • 2009Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 7: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies53 cited