Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument

Maurice A. Finocchiaro

49 citations0/0 files storedInformal Logic

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Education and Critical Thinking Development

Abstract

A critical examination of the dialectical approach, focusing on a comparison ofthe illative and the dialectical definitions of argument. I distinguish a moderate, a strong and a hyper dialectical conception of argument. I critique Goldman's argument for the moderate conception and Johnson's argument for the strong conception, and argue that the moderate conception is correct.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 49 citations exist upstream.

References

2003The Uses of Argument 2004Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950)1966Aspects of Scientific Explanation.1999Knowledge in a Social World 1988Contemporary Theories of Knowledge.1992Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: a pragma-dialectical perspective 1993Reconstructing argumentative discourse.2000Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument

Cited by

2005Arguments about Arguments 2005The Positive versus the Negative Evaluation of Arguments (1994)2005Asymmetries in Argumentation and Evaluation (1992)

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.