Reinventing Environmental Regulation Via the Government Performance and Results Act: Where's the Money?

Abstract

Editors' Summary: In 1993, Congress passed the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), which requires federal agencies to prepare strategic plans containing mission statements and statements of their goals and objectives.The plans must explain how the agencies will achieve these goals and must describe the resources they need to do so.The statute also requires agencies to begin preparing annual performance reports in March 2000 that compare their goals and performance indicators with their actual program performance.This Dialogue examines the impact of GPRA on EPA, and specifically on the Agency's strategic planning and budget processes.The Dialogue begins with an explanation of GPRA and the part the statute plays in recent efforts to "reinvent" government.It then examines historical trends in EPA's budget, especially in light of congressional mandates imposed on the Agency.The Dialogue considers the Agency's 1997 Strategic Plan and 1999 Annual Plan, and discusses the nexus between these documents and the actual fiscal allocations proposed by EPA.In an upcoming Dialogue, the authors will examine GPRA's impact on EPA's relationship with its state counterparts.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.