Article2004

Facing Death: Epicurus and His Critics

161 citations0/0 files storedDigital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Classical Philosophy and Thought Philosophical Ethics and Theory Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Abstract

James Warren examines and evaluates the argument that death is 'nothing to us'. He sets this against modern philosophical accounts of how death can be a harm and asks whether a life free from all fear of death is an attractive option and what the consequences would be of a full acceptance of the Epicureans' views.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 161 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2014The Pleasures of Reason in Plato, Aristotle, and the Hellenistic Hedonists 2013Philosophical Therapy as Preventive Psychological Medicine 2015Deletion as second death: the moral status of digital remains 2019Death and Immortality in Ancient Philosophy 2016Understanding Grief in Greece and Rome 2012The Epicurean View of Death 2015How A-theoretic Deprivationists Should Respond to Lucretius 2016Yet Another “Epicurean” Argument

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.