A comparison of nonresponse in mail, telephone, and face-to-face surveysJoop J. Hox, Edith D. de Leeuw1994-11-01articleQuality & Quantity248 citationsgreenNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Survey Methodology and NonresponseSurvey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesCensus and Population EstimationAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 248 citations exist upstream.References1988Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis1982Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.1979Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.1991Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research1994Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.1982Meta-analysis in social research2004Methods of Meta-Analysis1990Survey Errors and Survey Costs.Cited by2006The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Current Methods and Evaluation of 2001 Response Rates2009Questionnaire Survey Nonresponse: A Comparison of Postal Mail and Internet Surveys2004A Comparison of Response Characteristics from Web and Telephone Surveys2003Factors Affecting Response Rates to Natural Resource - Focused Mail Surveys: Empirical Evidence of Declining Rates Over Time2001The Drop-Off/Pick-Up Method For Household Survey Research2008National Incidence Studies of Missing, Abducted, Runaway, and Thrownaway Children2016Are housing tenure and car access still associated with health? A repeat cross-sectional study of UK adults over a 13-year period2019Companion shopping: the influence on mall brand experiences