Article2014

Adolescents' sustainability concerns and reasons for not consuming sustainably

51 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Consumer Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Environmental Sustainability in Business Environmental Education and Sustainability Consumer behavior in food and health

Abstract

Abstract Many consumers report being concerned about sustainability but they do not necessarily consume in a sustainable manner. Understanding why this occurs is vital to encouraging sustainable consumption practices. Understanding the phenomenon in relation to adolescents is particularly important. In addition to being a significant segment of current consumers, adolescents are learning consumption habits and preferences that they will carry into adulthood. This research contributes to the domain by fulfilling two research objectives. The first objective was to develop and use a scale for measuring adolescents' sustainability concerns (ASC). The second objective was to identify and examine adolescents' reasons for not consuming sustainably. The research used a three‐stage multi‐method design that included small group interviews and two online surveys with adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. The ASC scale that we produced identifies 14 key sustainability concerns across the dimensions of environment, well‐being and society. The reasons for not consuming sustainably varied across these dimensions. For example, the most frequently reported reasons in the environmental dimension included cost and convenience whereas peer pressure and hedonic preferences were the dominant reasons for well‐being. More broadly, three groups of reasons for unsustainable consumption emerged. These included (i) limited application of sustainability concerns across consumption; (ii) deviating from concerns due to competing priorities; and (iii) limiting or eliminating personal responsibility. The contributions of this research have theoretical, methodological and practical implications for consumer researchers, social marketers and policy makers.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 51 citations exist upstream.

References

1979A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs 1991Scale Development : Theory and Applications 2006The qualitative research interview 1978The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis in Behavioral and Life Sciences 1999Consumer Socialization of Children: A Retrospective Look At Twenty‐Five Years of Research 2008Advancing formative measurement models 2010The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference 2004Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology

Cited by

2013A proposed procedure for construct definition in marketing 2020Understanding circular economy in everyday life: Perceptions of young adults in the Finnish context 2023The impact of social vs environmental sustainability information disclosure on consumer choice of delivery time with varying sustainability concerns 2022Can a connection with the indigenous cultural values encourage sustainable apparel consumption?2020Taboo in consumption: Social structure, gender and sustainable menstrual products

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.