SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Dealing with clinical heterogeneity in meta‐analysis. Assumptions, methods, interpretation
16 references·8 citing·31 second hop
Dealing with clinical heterogeneity in meta‐analysis. Assumptions, methods, interpretation (2013)Dealing with clinical heterogeneity in me…Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Interpretation of random effe…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisA Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Eff…Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update (2006)Random-effects model for meta…Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Realist review - a new method…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Systematic Reviews in Health …Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Practical Meta-AnalysisExplaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Explaining heterogeneity in m…Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Systematic Review: Why source…The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. (1993)The efficacy of psychological…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…The benefits of psychotherapy (1980)The benefits of psychotherapyThe Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)The Combination of Estimates …Long-term outcomes of cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2022)Long-term outcomes of cogniti…Effectiveness and acceptance of technology-based psychological interventions for the acute treatment of unipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Preprint) (2020)Effectiveness and acceptance …Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in nutrition research (2019)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Selecting the best meta-analytic estimator for evidence-based practice: a simulation study (2019)Selecting the best meta-analy…Rationale and design of a systematic review: effectiveness and acceptance of technology-based psychological interventions in different clinical phases of depression management (2019)Rationale and design of a sys…Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults—A systematic review and meta‐analysis (METACOG) (2018)Effectiveness of metacognitiv…Angry Birds, Angry Children, and Angry Meta-Analysts (2016)Angry Birds, Angry Children, …Questionable assumptions hampered interpretation of a network meta-analysis of primary care depression treatments (2015)Questionable assumptions hamp…Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013 (2014)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)A Realist Theory of Science. (1977)62. Realism with a Human Face (2011)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited (2015)Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis (2015)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
  • 2000Practical Meta-Analysis9,196 cited
  • 1954The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments5,374 cited
  • 2005Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions3,187 cited
  • 2011Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses2,872 cited
  • 2008A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis2,562 cited
  • 2006Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update2,374 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 1980The benefits of psychotherapy2,111 cited
  • 1993The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis.2,032 cited
  • 1999Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods1,733 cited
  • 2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care1,692 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1994
Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated
1,016 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults—A systematic review and meta‐analysis (METACOG)114 cited
  • 2016Angry Birds, Angry Children, and Angry Meta-Analysts84 cited
  • 2022Long-term outcomes of cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials67 cited
  • 2019Selecting the best meta-analytic estimator for evidence-based practice: a simulation study66 cited
  • 2019Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in nutrition research35 cited
  • 2015Questionable assumptions hampered interpretation of a network meta-analysis of primary care depression treatments28 cited
  • 2019Rationale and design of a systematic review: effectiveness and acceptance of technology-based psychological interventions in different clinical phases of depression management10 cited
  • 2020Effectiveness and acceptance of technology-based psychological interventions for the acute treatment of unipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Preprint)8 cited