The argument from injustice : a reply to legal positivism

Stanley L. Paulson · Bonnie L. Paulson

265 citations0/0 files storedOxford University Press eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies Legal and Constitutional Studies Legal and Social Philosophy

Abstract

I THE PROBLEM OF LEGAL POSITIVISM 1. The Basic Positions 2. The Practical Significance of the Debate II THE CONCEPT OF LAW 1. Central Elements 2. Positivistic Concepts of Law 3. Critique of Positivistic Concepts of Law III THE VALIDITY OF LAW 1. Concepts of Validity 2. Collisions of Validity 3. Basic Norm IV DEFINITION

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 265 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2008On the Concept and the Nature of Law 2005Gustav Radbruch vs. Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law*2004The Nature of Legal Philosophy 2020Statutory Interpretation 2018Comparative Religious Law 2008Indefinite detention: rule by law or rule of law?2022Systemology of Information Law

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.