SStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleUsefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research

Lutz Bornmann2015

Article2015

Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research

53 citations·0/0 files stored·Aslib Journal of Information Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Publishing and Open Access Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this case study is to investigate the usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 53 citations exist upstream.

References

1984Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship 2012What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey 2014Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics 2013An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists 2014How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications 2014Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community 2011Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement 2012Measuring the societal impact of research

Cited by

2020Altmetrics data providers: A meta-analysis review of the coverage of metrics and publication 2017Context of altmetrics data matters: an investigation of count type and user category 2022What is the societal impact of university research? A policy-oriented review to map approaches, identify monitoring methods and success factors 2017Tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology 2015Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley 2016Academic Librarians’ Knowledge of Bibliometrics and Altmetrics 2017PlumX As a Potential Tool to Assess the Macroscopic Multidimensional Impact of Books 2016Normalization of Mendeley reader impact on the reader- and paper-side: A comparison of the mean discipline normalized reader score (MDNRS) with the mean normalized reader score (MNRS) and bare reader counts

Details

Year2015

Typearticle

Published2015-05-18

VenueAslib Journal of Information Management

ISSN-L0001-253X

Languageen

Citations53

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1108/ajim-09-2014-0115

openalex_workW1536474489

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.