Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A methodological approach to ratio bias

16 references·10 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition6,707 cited
1992Handbook of Personality : Theory and Research4,542 cited
1996The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.3,855 cited
1986Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.3,027 cited
2011Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory2,254 cited
1999The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon.1,252 cited
2006Numeracy and Decision Making1,178 cited
1997Rationality and reasoning1,075 cited
2009In two minds: Dual processes and beyond928 cited
1994Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment.810 cited
2008A Theory of Medical Decision Making and Health: Fuzzy Trace Theory602 cited
1998Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory580 cited
2007Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability486 cited
2011Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making483 cited
1995The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment.477 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1976The Origin of the Idea of Chance in Children453 cited

Cited by

2021“Many others are doing it, so why shouldn't I?”: How being in larger competitions leads to more cheating25 cited
2018Intrinsic whole number bias in humans.13 cited
2018Distinguishing the Ratio Bias from Unsystematic Error: Situation and Individual‐difference Effects9 cited
2018Factors influencing the ratio bias9 cited
2015THE DENOMINATOR NEGLECT IN DECISION-MAKING8 cited
2021Is there more than one ratio bias? If so, why?5 cited
2017What are my chances? An imagery versus discursive processing approach to understanding ratio-bias effects5 cited
2018A NEW TEST FOR RATIONALITY: CONTRIBUTIONS AND OUTSTANDING ISSUES4 cited
2021Students’ preference for grading rules: The role of ratio bias3 cited
2022People with jumping to conclusions bias tend to make context-independent decisions rather than context-dependent decisions2 cited