SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Meta‐Regression Models of Economics and Medical Research
16 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Meta‐Regression Models of Economics and Medical Research (2010)Meta‐Regression Models of Economics and M…Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Analysing Data and Undertakin…Beyond Publication Bias (2005)Beyond Publication BiasEvaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Evaluating non-randomised int…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in …How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)How should meta‐regression an…Wheat From Chaff: Meta-Analysis As Quantitative Literature Review (2001)Wheat From Chaff: Meta-Analys…Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research (2000)Methods for Meta-Analysis in …The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials (1998)The unpredictability paradox:…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…The Handbook of Research Synthesis (1994)The Handbook of Research Synt…META‐REGRESSION ANALYSIS: A QUANTITATIVE METHOD OF LITERATURE SURVEYS (1989)META‐REGRESSION ANALYSIS: A Q…Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)Publication Bias: A Problem i…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The file drawer problem and t…Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Publication Decisions and the…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review (2016)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement (2012)Artifact in behavioral research (1969)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)Robust variance estimation in meta‐regression with dependent effect size estimates (2010)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement (1996)Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. (2002)Less is more: Meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. (2003)Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. (1975)A meta-analytic review of prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder (2010)An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
  • 1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.9,043 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
  • 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
  • 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
  • 2000Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research1,795 cited
  • 2008Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses1,795 cited
  • 1994The Handbook of Research Synthesis1,054 cited
  • 1959Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa964 cited
  • 2001Wheat From Chaff: Meta-Analysis As Quantitative Literature Review948 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 1988Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data814 cited
  • 1989META‐REGRESSION ANALYSIS: A QUANTITATIVE METHOD OF LITERATURE SURVEYS805 cited
  • 1998The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

769 cited
  • 2005Beyond Publication Bias745 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.