A Judge Judges Judges

Armistead Mason Dobie

23 citations0/0 files storedOpen Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Judicial and Constitutional Studies Legal processes and jurisprudence Legal Systems and Judicial Processes

Abstract

If judges are to be judged, they would doubtless prefer to be judged by judges, whose critical judgments on their brothers are certainly tempered by sympathy and founded in experience. My viewpoint must be that of one on the inside looking out. Time does not permit my approach to be historical; I shall try not to make it hysterical. Since many within sound of my voice (which includes rather a wide area) are not versed in the lore and language of the law, I shall not be technical, and, as I believe in safe and sane celebrations, I shall use my utmost endeavor not to be pyrotechnical.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 23 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

20103 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning 20102 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging 201010 Judges, Expertise, and Analogy 20109 In Praise of Pedantic Eclecticism: Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Psychology of Judging 201016 Expertise of Court Judges 2010Introduction

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.