SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews
7 references·2 citing·37 second hop
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews (2015)Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vi…Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Nutrition: a systematic analysis (2013)Conclusiveness of the Cochran…The Cochrane Collaboration: International activity within Cochrane Review Groups in the first decade of the twenty‐first century (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration: I…Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Neonatal Reviews: A systematic analysis (2006)Conclusiveness of the Cochran…Negative Results and Impact Factor (2005)Negative Results and Impact F…So what has the Cochrane Collaboration ever done for us? A report card on the first 10 years (2004)So what has the Cochrane Coll…Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Publication and related bias …Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study (2022)Conclusiveness, linguistic ch…Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic search and analytical review (2019)Conclusiveness of Cochrane Re…How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of healthcare interventions? (2003)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)DEALING WITH DISASTER DATABASES – WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM HEALTH AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS?Application in practice (2011)Two-thirds of methodological research remained unpublished after presentation at Cochrane Colloquia: an empirical analysis (2012)Much at stake: the importance of training and capacity building for stakeholder engagement in evidence synthesis (2017)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis (2013)Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals (2016)Research Design in Clinical Psychology (2021)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Palliative and Supportive Care for Cancer (2015)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis (2006)The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013 (2014)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Using meta-analysis for benefits transfer: Theory and practice (2006)Screening for Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence in College Women: Missed Opportunities (2015)Methodological assessment of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies (2022)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care (1995)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions (2003)The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods (2009)Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) (2012)Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: What's there and what should be (2010)High quality of evidence is uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (2017)Should low-quality evidence dominate high-level evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of musculoskeletal physical therapy interventions (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2000Publication and related bias in meta-analysis2,283 cited
  • 2005Negative Results and Impact Factor85 cited
  • 2004So what has the Cochrane Collaboration ever done for us? A report card on the first 10 years61 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration: International activity within Cochrane Review Groups in the first decade of the twenty‐first century33 cited
  • 2006Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Neonatal Reviews: A systematic analysis29 cited
  • 2013Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Nutrition: a systematic analysis19 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic search and analytical review14 cited
  • 2022Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work